ÒCase Study Solved
Under the concept of:
ÒWelfare Rights and
Justice.
ÒWhistle Blowing.
ÒJustice and Fairness.
Legal Rights:
Ò“Legal Rights are rights that are recognized and enforced as part of a
legal system”
Ò Domino’s Delivering pizza by
violating traffic rules and to follow traffic rules are compulsory for every
citizen. Domino’s Driver say that.
Ò“The 30-minute policy would push me to do things I normally wouldn’t
do, like going 50 mph in a 40 mph zone.”
ÒSo it is proved that Domino’s
violating the legal rules and regulation.
Right to Life:
Ò Actually the Domino’s
driver Drive fast to meet the company offer of providing pizza within 30
minutes.
Ò In this Scenario
Domino’s is violating right to life because every person in the society has
right to life Domino’s Driver have no right to kill or injured any one by
driving fast on the road because their life is not a property of Domino’s.
Whistle blower
Ò“Whistle Blowers are generally conscious people who expose some wrong
doing often at personal risk”.
Whistle Blowing &
Conclusion:
Ò When the case of throwing
waste in municipal land fill was not solved in the company premises than Miss Chantale Leroux decided to blow the
whistle against the company and she tell this case to her friend who was
working in a local news paper.
Ò In this
scenario Miss Chantale is a “Whistle
Blower” because
she exposes the company illegal act in front of the public through news paper.
Utilitarianism
Ò Ethically
Domino is wrong but under the concept of utilitarianism they are allowed to
deliver pizza with in 30 minute slot because utilitarian theory says that.
Ò“An action is right if and only if it
produces the greatest possible balance of pleasure over pain for everyone”
Ò Under
the concept of utilitarianism they are allowed because
very few people suffered by this unethical act and the rest of peoples will
enjoy the pizza in their home.
No comments:
Post a Comment